Ucla Radiation Oncology's Online Review Report Card
Ucla Radiation Oncology
4.4
Average Star Rating
13
Total Reviews
0
Recent Reviews
3
Review Sites Found
Accepts Medicare
No
Source: data.cms.gov Check DocInfo.Org for any disciplinary action against this provider.
ScoreDoc is affiliated with RepuGen and GMR Web Team. You're welcome to work with them or any provider you choose.
Review Summary
UCLA Health received 84.6% positive feedback, with patients praising the compassionate care, professionalism, and knowledge of the staff. However, 15.4% of the feedback was negative, primarily citing administrative errors and poor communication. Overall, the care is highly regarded, yet it needs stronger administrative processes.ScoreDoc Score
Sentiment Analysis
| Top Entities | Top Positive Key Trend Drivers |
|---|
| Top Entities | Top Negative Key Trend Drivers |
|---|
Sentiment Analysis
Online Reviews Breakdown
List of Ucla Radiation Oncology's Reviews
At 74 years old, I was diagnosed with low-mid grade prostate cancer. After extensive research regarding the treatment of prostate cancer, and even though I live in Texas, I selected the radiation treatment provided by UCLA-Health. They utilized the Mridian accelerator by Viewray. Starting with Dr. Kishan, his staff, and the radiation techs... everyone was professional, knowledgeable, and friendly. I would give them all 10 stars, if that was an option. My treatments began in October 2023, and 8 months later, I have had little or no side effects. Thank you all very, very much for your excellent care.
As a retired physician and former medical school Dean I feel comfortable in evaluating the quality of medical care. Since one in every 7-8 men will eventually have prostate cancer I thought it might be useful to comment on my recent experiences at the UCLA health care system. Most of my practice era colleagues are now retired and I relied on my youngest son for a recommendation. He is now the Section Chief for Interventional Radiology at UCLA and he referred me to Drs. Wayne Brisbane (Urology), Dr. Albert Chang (Fiduciary and OAR spacer placement), and Dr. Amar Kishan (Radiation Oncology - Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy) at UCLA. I found the care by these physicians and their entire team to be exceptional. The equipment at UCLA is top notch and I would highly recommend consideration of this facility to anyone needing evaluation and management of this condition. It was certainly worth traveling to CA. Dr. Kishan has a number of presentations available on YouTube that I found helpful in making decisions regarding care. The evaluation and management of prostate cancer has changed dramatically since I was in active practice. I would like to formally express my appreciation to the professionals at UCLA - they have a highly developed system for providing comprehensive and responsive health care.
Dr. Chin is great, the radiation department staff are awesome, very caring and respectful.. the staff has a positive attitude all the time.. they are easy to talk to.. I have 3 more days until I'm finished with my neck cancer treatments.. it has been a long 32 days of treatment.
don't live in California. My medical lab results was high and diagnosed cancer by three Dr in three hospitals. I chose to get radiation treatment in UCLA. Dr Amer U Kishan is polite and professional. He save my life.
Super professional and experienced staff that treat the patients with kindness and dignity. My doctor for a one shot radiation on a tiny benign meningioma was Dr. Tania Kaprealian, a real pro. Highly recommended!!!
Wonderful caring and pleasant staff and campus
Everyone here is amazing. I'm always in dad out in no time. This guys all make a crappy situation almost fun. 5 stars all day.
Completed the feedback form UCLA requested. Never heard back. i guess it just looked politically correct for their PR rep to respond to the review. All show, no substance.
Here's my experience with UCLA Radiation Oncology; draw your own conclusions. My mother was diagnosed with a Stage 4 brain tumor in June 2016. We lived in Las Vegas, but I was desperate to get a second opinion at the illustrious UCLA Medical Center. I wrote a detailed letter to Dr. Tania Kaprealian and included MRI and PET scan reports and was given an appointment in mid July. I was told it would be a flat $800 private pay. Two days before our flight, UCLA called and said Dr. Kaprealian was busy and that we should be ready to pay $2000 to see an oncologist and a neurologist. I flew my mother to LA, paid the fee in full, and during a brief appointment with two rushed doctors was told that a biopsy was necessary before UCLA could provide any medical assistance. The procedure and recuperation time would take at least four weeks. (My mother had been given a month to live from initial diagnosis.) I received the report and flew my mother back home; she died on July 27. Then in October 2016, we received a collection notice for almost $800. It was only until I wrote a letter to the COO/CFO of UCLA's Dept of Radiation Oncology, promising to file a complaint with the CEO of the UCLA Medical Center, as well as the California Attorney General that I received a call saying that a mistake had been made and would be rectified. I never did receive a call, an email, a letter, or any type of communication from Dr. Tania Kaprealian; I guess she was quite busy for two years or so.
Dr. Cameron (and all of UCLA) are the best in the world. I had half a lung removed, as well as some other tissue, and radiologists who look at my x-ray and think I never had a lobe removed. He is a starter on the all-star team.
Did you find this reputation scorecard helpful?
Locations
No related location
Selection Criteria
All the information you see here is based on our analysis of internet reviews across the seven major review platforms most used by consumers during their healthcare provider selection. The platforms we selected are Google, WebMD, Yelp, HealthGrades, Facebook, RateMDs, and Vitals. The analysis algorithm uses the compiled data of average score, recency of reviews, number of reviews, and the sentiment expressed in the written comments. It then assigns weight to each parameter based on the available research on how consumers use reviews in their doctor selection process. This report is designed to help identify the doctors with the best overall review score in an area and does not reflect the doctors' competence.
Disclaimer
We recognize the importance of reviews in your selection of a healthcare provider. While we strive to make the information on this report as accurate as possible, ScoreDoc makes no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of this report and is not liable for errors and omissions in the materials. ScoreDoc works with a 3rd party to collect data for generating this report. We encourage you to review the report for accuracy by visiting individual review platforms of doctors of interest based on their overall review score. We suggest you consider this report as initial input and independently verify all info before deciding on your healthcare provider.
Google
Yelp
Facebook
