Uc Irvine Health's Online Review Report Card
Uc Irvine Health
4.3
Average Star Rating
644
Total Reviews
0
Recent Reviews
3
Review Sites Found
Accepts Medicare
--
Medical School
-
Graduation Year
-
Source: data.cms.gov Check DocInfo.Org for any disciplinary action against this provider.
ScoreDoc is affiliated with RepuGen and GMR Web Team. You're welcome to work with them or any provider you choose.
Sentiment Analysis
| Top Entities | Top Positive Key Trend Drivers |
|---|
| Top Entities | Top Negative Key Trend Drivers |
|---|
Sentiment Analysis
Online Reviews Breakdown
List of Uc Irvine Health's Reviews
World class care....LOL. The doctors are 2nd rate at best especially in the neurological unit and especially when it comes to EPILEPSY. The care I have received there is horrible. BEFORE coming to University California of Idiots I had gone TEN YEARS without a seizure. in the last 3 years I've had FIVE. Why??? Because my previous Epitologist had retired. And in the past year my "Doctor" kept increasing my medication. I'm currently trying to work with her and maybe...lol she will listen to me for a change. But I doubt it because she's a pill pusher. 💊. I've had this illness for 44 years and I know more than she does. I've had it longer than most of the people who work there have been alive. Cross posted.
Kim Cherry, diagnosed 2011. Kim was diagnosed with the bulbar form of ALS and was given one year to live. His symptoms progressed quickly. Soon he was having difficulty breathing, swallowing and even walking short distances. With the help of several holistic medical practitioners and his wife Kay’s research he has been able to reverse most of his symptoms using diet, herbs, supplements and oxygen therapies including direct IV ozone, which he feels has made the most difference. Kim is playing golf again. He is now 69 and these herbs clinic( healthmedlabclinic1@gmail.com) help him recovered fully.
Care about your patients. My wife had to stop her meds (is currently off them). Then her doctor HAD to retire (understandable). Now she is off her meds and the "BEST" UCI can do is see her sometime in May of 2022. So all I can do is watch her decline as I look for another doctor to help her. Communication within the Neurology Group is terrible. The doctors assistant was telling my wife one thing while the doctor was telling her the exact opposite.....
What a joke they are so unorganized don’t tell you the truth lie for you to come into ER then tell you they don’t know if they can do specific things when you get In there they are all about making money typical.
Today I saw Dr. Courtney and her Neuro team. Amazing service from the time I walked in to the time I walked out. I wish I would have had them take over my care years ago. I am super impressed with her style and the amount of time she spent with me to team up for a new Tx plan for MS!
what a great health care system in the world !!!
Top medical facility in Southern California.
The organization setup is disconnected. With such a large staff of professionals and trainees I believe the patient becomes a third party to his or her medical issues. It appears the patient becomes the subject a training classes, each specialist team becomes a class for a team's narrow field of practice / speacily, as a patient trys to understand their problems and correction. It's almost as if a diagnosis must involve the input of the total summation of the teams majority resolve in a case. Although, there is a hierarchy system, care is delayed due to the simplest interruption. The patient at UCI IS THE TRAINING COURSE.
15 hours after being admitted, I am still waiting on a room. Been to hospitals in 9 countries over the years and this is the worst patient experience ever.
This facility’s awesome, the medical staff is the best, not to mention the top of the line equipment,
Did you find this reputation scorecard helpful?
Locations
No related location
Selection Criteria
All the information you see here is based on our analysis of internet reviews across the seven major review platforms most used by consumers during their healthcare provider selection. The platforms we selected are Google, WebMD, Yelp, HealthGrades, Facebook, RateMDs, and Vitals. The analysis algorithm uses the compiled data of average score, recency of reviews, number of reviews, and the sentiment expressed in the written comments. It then assigns weight to each parameter based on the available research on how consumers use reviews in their doctor selection process. This report is designed to help identify the doctors with the best overall review score in an area and does not reflect the doctors' competence.
Disclaimer
We recognize the importance of reviews in your selection of a healthcare provider. While we strive to make the information on this report as accurate as possible, ScoreDoc makes no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of this report and is not liable for errors and omissions in the materials. ScoreDoc works with a 3rd party to collect data for generating this report. We encourage you to review the report for accuracy by visiting individual review platforms of doctors of interest based on their overall review score. We suggest you consider this report as initial input and independently verify all info before deciding on your healthcare provider.
Google
WebMD
Yelp
HealthGrades
Facebook
RateMDs
Vitals
