Last updated on 3/11/2022 | Get latest review report for $1
Average Star Rating
Total Reviews
Recent Reviews
Review Sites Found
--
-
-
Source: data.cms.gov Check DocInfo.Org for any disciplinary action against this provider.
Ucla Medical Group does not have an adequate amount of comments to generate the sentiment analysis.
Good office to visit. Nice staff, doctor Gunn was very helpful. I didn't have any problems with communicating via phone either.
Good office to visit. Nice staff, doctor Gunn was very helpful. I didn't have any problems with communicating via phone either.
Although I was concerned when my primary care provider transferred. I was able to resume receiving care at this location. I've enjoyed having care with UCLA for a short period of time. Yet, every time, they made me feel special. If I have any questions, their staff follows back with additional questions in a promptly manner. I'm not sure what healthcare will become in the future but as long as I can continue receiving these services, I'll enjoy all that comes with it. Thanks to my UCLA team.
The doctors are good. What is NOT ACCEPTABLE is the outrageously long hold times to speak to the front desk to schedule or cancel an appointment, as well as the longer and longer wait times to get in to see a doctor.We very much like the quality of care. We hope that this health system can address the wait times for their patients.
The doctors are good. What is NOT ACCEPTABLE is the outrageously long hold times to speak to the front desk to schedule or cancel an appointment, as well as the longer and longer wait times to get in to see a doctor.We very much like the quality of care. We hope that this health system can address the wait times for their patients.
I will second one of the reviews posted here because I hope there will be improvements. It's impossible to get a hold of a live person when you call. Both times, I waited over 10 minutes and opted for a call back and never received a phone call. I sent a message complaining and was told I should allow 2-3 days for a return phone call. It's been 3 weeks since the first call I made and the end of the third day since my second call, so I'm not holding my breath. The facility itself, once on-site, is great. The staff is friendly. My doctor was very quick at communicating with me about my blood work. No issues there. But please, please, do something about the phone. When patients call, it's because there's a health issue and having to wait 2-3 days isn't acceptable. I've never had to wait that long at any other medical offices. I ended up having to go to Urgent Care since I couldn't get a hold of someone and that defeats the purpose of trying to build a relationship with my new doctor. It makes me feel ignored and like my health issues aren't a concern to UCLA.
I will second one of the reviews posted here because I hope there will be improvements. It's impossible to get a hold of a live person when you call. Both times, I waited over 10 minutes and opted for a call back and never received a phone call. I sent a message complaining and was told I should allow 2-3 days for a return phone call. It's been 3 weeks since the first call I made and the end of the third day since my second call, so I'm not holding my breath. The facility itself, once on-site, is great. The staff is friendly. My doctor was very quick at communicating with me about my blood work. No issues there. But please, please, do something about the phone. When patients call, it's because there's a health issue and having to wait 2-3 days isn't acceptable. I've never had to wait that long at any other medical offices. I ended up having to go to Urgent Care since I couldn't get a hold of someone and that defeats the purpose of trying to build a relationship with my new doctor. It makes me feel ignored and like my health issues aren't a concern to UCLA.
No related location
All the information you see here is based on our analysis of internet reviews across the seven major review platforms most used by consumers during their healthcare provider selection. The platforms we selected are Google, WebMD, Yelp, HealthGrades, Facebook, RateMDs, and Vitals. The analysis algorithm uses the compiled data of average score, recency of reviews, number of reviews, and the sentiment expressed in the written comments. It then assigns weight to each parameter based on the available research on how consumers use reviews in their doctor selection process. This report is designed to help identify the doctors with the best overall review score in an area and does not reflect the doctors' competence.
We recognize the importance of reviews in your selection of a healthcare provider. While we strive to make the information on this report as accurate as possible, ScoreDoc makes no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of this report and is not liable for errors and omissions in the materials. ScoreDoc works with a 3rd party to collect data for generating this report. We encourage you to review the report for accuracy by visiting individual review platforms of doctors of interest based on their overall review score. We suggest you consider this report as initial input and independently verify all info before deciding on your healthcare provider.