Irfan A. Khan's Online Review Report Card
Irfan A. Khan
3.9
Average Star Rating
62
Total Reviews
0
Recent Reviews
4
Review Sites Found
Accepts Medicare
--
Medical School
-
Graduation Year
-
Source: data.cms.gov Check DocInfo.Org for any disciplinary action against this provider.
ScoreDoc is affiliated with RepuGen and GMR Web Team. You're welcome to work with them or any provider you choose.
Sentiment Analysis
| Top Entities | Top Positive Key Trend Drivers |
|---|
| Top Entities | Top Negative Key Trend Drivers |
|---|
Sentiment Analysis
Online Reviews Breakdown
List of Irfan A. Khan's Reviews
The receptionist was rude and uncaring. They made me wait for twenty minutes on hold. I called back and she didn’t even let me speak and asked me for my information and said she doesn’t have time for me at the moment; what a disappointment
For blood glucose / diabetes type II
Great doctor - informed and easy to work with
I love Dr. Khan. He's always been Professional, kind, and proactive. The office staff, however, has ALWAYS been rude to me.
I love Dr. Khan. I've never had to wait long. He is professional, kind and caring. I am also very hard to get blood from, his onsite lab has never stuck me more than twice. (The record is 28 sticks elsewhere.)
I was Dr. Khan's patient some years ago, and would not recommend him to anyone I care about. I was referred to him for a thyroid nodule, the care for which was adequate. However, I also reported fatigue and increased thirst to him. He ran some blood tests and determined that I had prediabetes. The only thing he said about it was "try to lose some weight." Dr. Khan did not explain to me that the thirst and fatigue were likely related to the prediabetes and could improve if it was proactively addressed. When I emailed him about it recently, he claimed that prediabetes has no symptoms! Seriously? Dr. Khan must not like reading scientific literature. He also replied that at the time of my diagnosis taking a more proactive approach wasn't the standard. How about an approach that's helpful to the patient? Not the standard either?
I was Dr. Kahn's patient some years ago, and would not recommend him to anyone I care about. I was referred to him for a thyroid nodule, the care for which was adequate. However, I also reported fatigue and increased thirst to him. He ran some blood tests and determined that I had prediabetes. The only thing he said about it was "try to lose some weight." Dr. Kahn did not explain to me that the thirst and fatigue were likely related to the prediabetes and could improve if it was proactively addressed. When I emailed him about it recently, he claimed that prediabetes has no symptoms! Seriously? Dr. Kahn must not like reading scientific literature. He also replied that at the time of my diagnosis taking a more proactive approach wasn't the standard. How about an approach that's helpful to the patient? Not the standard either?
I was Dr. Kahn's patient some years ago, and would not recommend him to anyone I care about. I was referred to him for a thyroid nodule, the care for which was adequate. However, I also reported fatigue and increased thirst to him. He ran some blood tests and determined that I had prediabetes. The only thing he said about it was "try to lose some weight." Dr. Kahn did not explain to me that the thirst and fatigue were likely related to the prediabetes and could improve if it was proactively addressed. When I emailed him about it recently, he claimed that prediabetes has no symptoms! Seriously? Dr. Kahn must not like reading scientific literature. He also replied that at the time of my diagnosis taking a more proactive approach wasn't the standard. How about an approach that's helpful to the patient? Not the standard either?
I had a great 1st impression with Dr. Irfan A. Khan, welcoming and that is the 1st step to having a great doctor. I am on the right road to recovery with my diabetes. I highly recommend this doctor.
Looking for a endocrinologist as regards to HRT and trans health but got hung up on. Wow...
Did you find this reputation scorecard helpful?
Locations
No related location
Selection Criteria
All the information you see here is based on our analysis of internet reviews across the seven major review platforms most used by consumers during their healthcare provider selection. The platforms we selected are Google, WebMD, Yelp, HealthGrades, Facebook, RateMDs, and Vitals. The analysis algorithm uses the compiled data of average score, recency of reviews, number of reviews, and the sentiment expressed in the written comments. It then assigns weight to each parameter based on the available research on how consumers use reviews in their doctor selection process. This report is designed to help identify the doctors with the best overall review score in an area and does not reflect the doctors' competence.
Disclaimer
We recognize the importance of reviews in your selection of a healthcare provider. While we strive to make the information on this report as accurate as possible, ScoreDoc makes no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of this report and is not liable for errors and omissions in the materials. ScoreDoc works with a 3rd party to collect data for generating this report. We encourage you to review the report for accuracy by visiting individual review platforms of doctors of interest based on their overall review score. We suggest you consider this report as initial input and independently verify all info before deciding on your healthcare provider.
Google
WebMD
Yelp
HealthGrades
Facebook
RateMDs
Vitals
