Bradley V. Davitt's Online Review Report Card
Bradley V. Davitt
4.4
Average Star Rating
25
Total Reviews
0
Recent Reviews
4
Review Sites Found
Accepts Medicare
--
Medical School
-
Graduation Year
-
Source: data.cms.gov Check DocInfo.Org for any disciplinary action against this provider.
ScoreDoc is affiliated with RepuGen and GMR Web Team. You're welcome to work with them or any provider you choose.
Sentiment Analysis
Bradley V. Davitt does not have an adequate amount of comments to generate the sentiment analysis.
Online Reviews Breakdown
List of Bradley V. Davitt's Reviews
My daughter has been seeing Dr. Davitt for 14 years and he is incredible! Very personable and great with kids of all ages.
Ophthalmologist Brad Davitt, M.D., is a Ruling Elder at Covenant Presbyterian Church (CPC), St. Louis, MO. As a Ruling Elder, he sits on the Session with eleven other men that act as CPC’s governing body. Subpoenaed documents from CPC, which the Ruling Elders never expected to be made public, reveal emotional abuse of children, lying, harassment, spying, and an attempt to cover-up their actions. Lying Brad Davitt approved of CPC senior minister, Ryan Laughlin, publicly lying to the CPC congregation about Laughlin’s relationship with Kelly Robinson, CPC Director of Children’s Ministries. Laughlin had arranged a house for Kelly to live in when she left her husband, Kent Robinson, and had 10.5 hours of phone conversations with Kelly until Laughlin’s wife learned about his relationship with Kelly. Coverup of child abuse, HIPAA violation, and a felony accusation Brad Davitt approved of a secret CPC Commission being formed to give Kelly “Biblical grounds” to seek a divorce. This Commission interrogated the three Robinson daughters knowing that there had been five hospitalizations for suicidal depression, four suicide attempts, and fear of going before the Commission caused the girls enormous stress. The Commission also interviewed Kent’s marriage counselor, Jonathan Hart, without his knowledge or permission and accused Kent of a felony in their report. The existence of the Commission, the Commission’s findings, and their report, were never mentioned in the Session minutes. Yet the Session minutes are detailed enough to list every man that prayed for Kent at the close of a Session meeting. Spying on Kent Robinson The Session assigned other CPC members to spy on Kent. One of these people was CPC organist Jonathan McGuire. It’s not known if CPC had Kent followed or used electronic surveillance methods. CPC harassed Kent Robinson Brad Davitt participated in the harassment of Kent. Three previous citations from CPC had been sent Kent by FedEx, Registered Mail, and Priority Mail Express demanding he appear before the Session. The Session sent Ruling Elders John Dawson and Roland Van Heest to hand-delivered a fourth citation to Kent’s home demanding Kent speak to the Session. CPC has attempted to silence Kent Robinson The Session obtained a Restraining Order against Kent. In their pleading they stated, “The content of Petitioner’s publication is irreparably damaging to CPC, CPC’s congregation, pastoral staff, and Session.” Everything published by Kent was taken directly from subpoenaed CPC documents. CPC characterizes people learning the truth about their actions as, “irreparably damaging”; a tacit admission of institutionalized abuse and corruption. Summary Say “No” to child abuse and bullying in the name of God and use another board-certified ophthalmologist besides Davitt.
Dr. Davitt is wonderful with children and parents!
Dr. Davitt has been very good with my young daughter with cp and epilepsy. He is very knowledgeable and very patient with young children.
Did you find this reputation scorecard helpful?
Locations
No related location
Selection Criteria
All the information you see here is based on our analysis of internet reviews across the seven major review platforms most used by consumers during their healthcare provider selection. The platforms we selected are Google, WebMD, Yelp, HealthGrades, Facebook, RateMDs, and Vitals. The analysis algorithm uses the compiled data of average score, recency of reviews, number of reviews, and the sentiment expressed in the written comments. It then assigns weight to each parameter based on the available research on how consumers use reviews in their doctor selection process. This report is designed to help identify the doctors with the best overall review score in an area and does not reflect the doctors' competence.
Disclaimer
We recognize the importance of reviews in your selection of a healthcare provider. While we strive to make the information on this report as accurate as possible, ScoreDoc makes no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of this report and is not liable for errors and omissions in the materials. ScoreDoc works with a 3rd party to collect data for generating this report. We encourage you to review the report for accuracy by visiting individual review platforms of doctors of interest based on their overall review score. We suggest you consider this report as initial input and independently verify all info before deciding on your healthcare provider.
Google
WebMD
Yelp
HealthGrades
Facebook
RateMDs
Vitals
