David Nieves Md's Online Review Report Card
David Nieves Md
3.5
Average Star Rating
229
Total Reviews
3
Recent Reviews
6
Review Sites Found
Accepts Medicare
--
Medical School
-
Graduation Year
-
Source: data.cms.gov Check DocInfo.Org for any disciplinary action against this provider.
ScoreDoc is affiliated with RepuGen and GMR Web Team. You're welcome to work with them or any provider you choose.
Sentiment Analysis
| Top Entities | Top Positive Key Trend Drivers |
|---|
| Top Entities | Top Negative Key Trend Drivers |
|---|
Sentiment Analysis
Online Reviews Breakdown
List of David Nieves Md's Reviews
I AM A PHYSICIAN with 23 years of clinical experience, and I will defend my medical colleagues to the death! This is the first review of a physician that I have ever written. I was compelled to write it. I was very disappointed with the medical care that I received from Dr. Nieves. I would like the Doctor to hear constructive feedback regarding his care. I am writing this review respectfully and thoughtfully, and not spitefully. I have also previously written a careful letter to the Doctor and the office manager. The office manager and medical assistants were polite and respectful. The manager called me after receiving my letter and was very apologetic and professional. All the folks that work in this office are excellent. The office is extremely well run and clean. This review focuses solely on Dr. Nieves. I saw the doctor in regards to psoriasis and acne. The medical care was severely deficient: 1. The careful medication review by the MA was totally ignored by the Doctor. It was clear to me that he did not review the medication list. An association between one of my medications and acne was ignored. Historical data about Acutane as a treatment for acne was never obtained. Possible drug interactions were ignored. 2. A well-described side effect of one of my medications as a cause of psoriasis was ignored…..The Doctor simply stated that “no one knows why people get psoriasis”. 3. Doxycycline was flippantly prescribed with ZERO discussion about possible side effects such as sun sensitivity, and no review of my medications for possible drug interactions. Doxycycline has a significant drug interaction with one of my medications. 4. A discussion of possible biological treatment for psoriasis took 5 seconds, literally. 5. A topical steroid for scalp treatment of psoriasis was prescribed, but there was no mention that when this medication is used in patients with a particular underlying medical condition, a dangerous adverse clinical outcome can sometimes occur....……Several months later, this adverse clinical syndrome did in fact occur. THIS CLINICAL SYNDROME CAN SOMETIMES BE LETHAL. 6. Steroid injections for my scalp were performed. The doctor spent under 60 seconds doing these injections with zero discussion of RBC's (risks, benefits, complications) related to my underlying medical conditions. These injections can very rarely produce the same adverse clinical syndrome as stated in #5. 7. The total duration of the office visit was approximately 10 minutes…..Given the complexities in regards to discussion of psoriasis, acne, performing injections, a medication list, prescription of two medications, and a discussion of biological treatments for psoriasis, 10 minutes is grossly inadequate. The infamous stereotype about dermatologists is that they are interested only in generating revenue via cosmetic procedures, and that they are not "real" doctors, meaning that they don't practice "real" medicine. I have previously defended my dermatology colleagues to the death in against this stereotype. No longer! In regards to Dr. Nieves unfortunately, this stereotype is dead on. As a fellow physician, I am deeply disappointed that Dr. Nieves did not perform the most basic medical tasks that all physicians master during medical school: ALWAYS REVIEW THE MEDICAL HISTORY. ALWAYS REVIEW MEDICATIONS AS THEY RELATE TO THE CAUSES OF DISEASES. ALWAYS REVIEW POSSIBLE DRUG INTERACTIONS. Failure to do these three tasks at every single patient interaction can cause adverse patient outcomes and can occasionally cause deaths. In summary, the care provided to me was substandard. In fact, it was dangerous. I am saddened that a distinguished peer of mine, who has been so expertly trained, would provide such deficient care which wound up causing dangerous clinical outcomes. As a physician with 23 years of experience, it's been my lifelong goal that all people receive only the best medical care. In this case, the care was down-right dangerous. It is essential that Dr. Nieves’ care improves. Respectfully, WB
Doctor barely spent 5 minutes with me. Did only a very fast visual exam of my body. He had not read my chart and didn't know I had a cancerous spot removed some time ago. When I asked him if I should make an appointment for my annual next year he said no you're not a high risk patient and left the room. I thought everyone was supposed get an annual skin exam
Fantastic doctor
This doctor has terrible bed side manners. Ruthlessly announced I had rosacea by looking at my face for all but 2 seconds. When I tried asking more questions about it and expressed concern over maintaining an anti-aging skin care routine, he scoffed at me dismissing my concerns as vanity. Will never go to Windsor dermatology or this doctor in the future.
Staff was nice and very friendly the facility was beautiful. But the doctor spent all of three minutes with me. It seemed like he just rushed me out and I forgot to ask a question.
Appropriate Covid precautions. Almost nobody in the waiting room. Saw the doctor quickly. He seems very knowledgeable. At the end of the exam, he asked if I had any questions. I had one that he answered quickly. He then left the exam room. He was in and out in 5 minutes. I’ve had similar exams with other doctors that took much longer. The feeling is that longer exams are more thorough.
Very good experience. Handicap entrance and accommodations are great no problem getting in with a wheelchair. Dr. Nieves is easy to talk with and communicates well. A very competent and friendly staff.
very courteous and professional
Very professional. Everything quick and straight to the point.
Very knowledgeable
Did you find this reputation scorecard helpful?
Locations
No related location
Selection Criteria
All the information you see here is based on our analysis of internet reviews across the seven major review platforms most used by consumers during their healthcare provider selection. The platforms we selected are Google, WebMD, Yelp, HealthGrades, Facebook, RateMDs, and Vitals. The analysis algorithm uses the compiled data of average score, recency of reviews, number of reviews, and the sentiment expressed in the written comments. It then assigns weight to each parameter based on the available research on how consumers use reviews in their doctor selection process. This report is designed to help identify the doctors with the best overall review score in an area and does not reflect the doctors' competence.
Disclaimer
We recognize the importance of reviews in your selection of a healthcare provider. While we strive to make the information on this report as accurate as possible, ScoreDoc makes no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of this report and is not liable for errors and omissions in the materials. ScoreDoc works with a 3rd party to collect data for generating this report. We encourage you to review the report for accuracy by visiting individual review platforms of doctors of interest based on their overall review score. We suggest you consider this report as initial input and independently verify all info before deciding on your healthcare provider.
Google
WebMD
Yelp
HealthGrades
Facebook
RateMDs
Vitals
