Stephen William Mihalsky's Online Review Report Card
Stephen William Mihalsky
4.7
Average Star Rating
12
Total Reviews
0
Recent Reviews
4
Review Sites Found
Accepts Medicare
--
Medical School
-
Graduation Year
-
Source: data.cms.gov Check DocInfo.Org for any disciplinary action against this provider.
ScoreDoc is affiliated with RepuGen and GMR Web Team. You're welcome to work with them or any provider you choose.
Review Summary
OU Medical Center Edmond received 91.7% positive feedback, with patients praising Dr. Mihalsky's professionalism, surgical skills, and excellent bedside manner. However, 8.3% of the feedback was negative, primarily citing misdiagnosis and arrogant nature. Overall, the practice is esteemed for its exceptional surgical outcomes, yet it needs stronger diagnostic processes.ScoreDoc Score
Sentiment Analysis
| Top Entities | Top Positive Key Trend Drivers |
|---|
| Top Entities | Top Negative Key Trend Drivers |
|---|
Sentiment Analysis
Online Reviews Breakdown
WebMD
Yelp
Facebook
RateMDs
List of Stephen William Mihalsky's Reviews
I truly appreciate Dr. Milhausky,'s surgery on my left hand. I am recovering well and I will highly recommend him if anyone needs his services.
Reviewed On Vitals
Dr. MIHALSKY is the best. By surgery on both hands, he saved my keyboard skills. He breeds confidence. I give him a triple A+.
Reviewed On HealthGrades
Very happy with the professional experience with Dr.Mihalsky. Highly recommend this guy on any hand injurys. He knows his stuff!
Reviewed On Google
Very pleasant demeanor. Gives the patient plenty of time to ask questions. And, when something needs to be modified because of the patient's preference, doctor doesn't hesitate to make it happen for the patient. He has done 11 surgeries on me. Outcome is always what he tells me is going to happen.
Reviewed On Vitals
Excellent care M
Reviewed On Vitals
Dr. Mihalsky practices below the standard of care, thanks to his arrogant nature. He misdiagnosed two fractures in my hand and refused to further investigate, assuring me it was "soft tissue damage." Asking for another radiograph irritated him and was like pulling teeth. When he still misdiagnosed, he acted appalled that I requested an MRI to figure out why this "soft tissue damage" wasn't healing after months of splinting (per his orders) and would not offer me one. 4 days later I took HIS radiographs to another surgeon and there were 2 obvious fractures needing surgery. The other surgeon also immediately sent me for an MRI confirming another fractured bone fragment. One was an avulsion that had been misdiagnosed so long it had started to attach elsewhere in my hand. It's now permanently screwed back in. On top of all of this, I had a job that required intense hand strength and dexterity so I was put out of work for way longer than necessary had I just been listened to and/or diagnosed correctly the first time.
Reviewed On Vitals
Dr Mihalsky and staff were very professional. After a not so good experience at an Oklahoma City hospital emergency room my husband was able to get in and be seen right away by De Mihalsky and able to have surgery the next day. The table saw won but Dr Mihalsky skillfully saved his fractured mangled index finger (rebuilding, pinning, nerves, blood flow) and did a revision on his amputated middle finger. We HIGHLY recommend Dr Stephen Mihalsky and OU Medical Center Edmond.
Reviewed On HealthGrades
had thumb joint replacement surgery and he did an excellent job! He's the best!
Reviewed On Vitals
Dr. Mihalsky is a very good doctor with great bedside manner. Does a great job with surgery. Can't even see my scars.
Reviewed On Vitals
Dr. Mihalsky has a very good bedside manner. He is soft spoken, asks questions to find out your needs and makes you feel like getting your situation fixed is his priority. I will definitely refer him to others!
Reviewed On Vitals
Did you find this reputation scorecard helpful?
Locations
No related location
Download ScoreDoc App for Safe Report Storage
Selection Criteria
All the information you see here is based on our analysis of internet reviews across the seven major review platforms most used by consumers during their healthcare provider selection. The platforms we selected are Google, WebMD, Yelp, HealthGrades, Facebook, RateMDs, and Vitals. The analysis algorithm uses the compiled data of average score, recency of reviews, number of reviews, and the sentiment expressed in the written comments. It then assigns weight to each parameter based on the available research on how consumers use reviews in their doctor selection process. This report is designed to help identify the doctors with the best overall review score in an area and does not reflect the doctors' competence.
Disclaimer
We recognize the importance of reviews in your selection of a healthcare provider. While we strive to make the information on this report as accurate as possible, ScoreDoc makes no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of this report and is not liable for errors and omissions in the materials. ScoreDoc works with a 3rd party to collect data for generating this report. We encourage you to review the report for accuracy by visiting individual review platforms of doctors of interest based on their overall review score. We suggest you consider this report as initial input and independently verify all info before deciding on your healthcare provider.
