Gregg S Shander's Online Review Report Card
3.7
Average Star Rating
36
Total Reviews
0
Recent Reviews
5
Review Sites Found
Accepts Medicare
--
Medical School
-
Graduation Year
-
Source: data.cms.gov Check DocInfo.Org for any disciplinary action against this provider.
ScoreDoc is affiliated with RepuGen and GMR Web Team. You're welcome to work with them or any provider you choose.
Sentiment Analysis
Gregg S Shander does not have an adequate amount of comments to generate the sentiment analysis.
Online Reviews Breakdown
List of Gregg S Shander's Reviews
Dr. Shander is great. The departments scheduling services are terrible they reschedule without informing you. When called back in to confirm on day of after a recent procedure and was told by doctor he wanted to see me the following week scheduling pushed it out a month and a half....and I wouldnt have known if I didnt call.
Dr. Shander is an excellent doctor. He is very patient and knowledgeable and kind. I am very pleased with my experience and outcome of my surgery. I give God all the Glory for leading me to him. I would highly recommend him to everyone. Thank you Dr. Shander. Sincerely Donna M. Burns from Rossville GA March 1 2019
Dr. Shander is caring very considerate professional and trustworthy. Not to mention extremely intelligent. He certainly takes his time with his patients exploring options without overlooking or under telling them pieces of information. I would definitely advocate and recommend him to others.
Although he is an expert in pacers and ablation he has no interest in the patient. When asked if extreme fatigue dizziness blood pressure dropping and incidents of pulse of 122 were due to pacemaker failing he had no idea of what I was talking about. His response was a blank look and no answer. My husband has been a patient of his for 12 years these events had been discussed with Dr. Shanders assistant. Apparently the doctor doesnt care enough to read his patients chart
I dont think I have ever seen anyone with his compassion He is my sons doctor and he has been extremely concerned and loving and thorough. Love him
Shander inserted replacement ICD. Stated lead placements were fine. Stated it is Institute policy to not issue new monitors until approx. 30 days postop. The �old� monitor did not read my husbands new ICD. Went 30 days without monitoring. Really doubt accepted standards of care were followed. Subsequent evaluation by another EP physician revealed one lead not in correct position. Extremely LONG wait times followed by 5 10 minute interaction with physician. This physician thought it was fine for my husband to be on Plavix and Eliquis at the same time while his colleague Dr. Warren wanted Plavix stopped. Drugs.Com interaction checker states it is major risk for both drugs to be taken at the same time. This is a volume and revenue focused practice where physicians seem under a lot of pressure to see as many patients as possible.
inserted replacement ICD. Stated lead placements were fine. Stated it is Institute policy to not issue new monitors until approx. 30 days postop. The “old” monitor did not read the new ICD. Went 30 days without monitoring. Really doubt accepted standards of care were followed. Subsequent evaluation by another EP physician revealed one lead not in correct position. LONG wait times for 10 15 minute office visit.
Confident but never arrogant or rushed extremely thorough diagnostic process took time to listen and answer my list of 24 pretreatment questions. Nurses are top notch as well as his nurse practitioner and the team that calibrates and monitors my bivent ICD.
Did you find this reputation scorecard helpful?
Locations
No related location
Selection Criteria
All the information you see here is based on our analysis of internet reviews across the seven major review platforms most used by consumers during their healthcare provider selection. The platforms we selected are Google, WebMD, Yelp, HealthGrades, Facebook, RateMDs, and Vitals. The analysis algorithm uses the compiled data of average score, recency of reviews, number of reviews, and the sentiment expressed in the written comments. It then assigns weight to each parameter based on the available research on how consumers use reviews in their doctor selection process. This report is designed to help identify the doctors with the best overall review score in an area and does not reflect the doctors' competence.
Disclaimer
We recognize the importance of reviews in your selection of a healthcare provider. While we strive to make the information on this report as accurate as possible, ScoreDoc makes no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of this report and is not liable for errors and omissions in the materials. ScoreDoc works with a 3rd party to collect data for generating this report. We encourage you to review the report for accuracy by visiting individual review platforms of doctors of interest based on their overall review score. We suggest you consider this report as initial input and independently verify all info before deciding on your healthcare provider.
Google
WebMD
Yelp
HealthGrades
Facebook
RateMDs
Vitals
