Paul Conkling's Online Review Report Card
Paul Conkling
3.4
Average Star Rating
5
Total Reviews
0
Recent Reviews
4
Review Sites Found
Accepts Medicare
--
Medical School
-
Graduation Year
-
Source: data.cms.gov Check DocInfo.Org for any disciplinary action against this provider.
ScoreDoc is affiliated with RepuGen and GMR Web Team. You're welcome to work with them or any provider you choose.
Sentiment Analysis
Paul Conkling does not have an adequate amount of comments to generate the sentiment analysis.
Online Reviews Breakdown
List of Paul Conkling's Reviews
I have been seeing Dr. Conkling since 2012 when I was diagnosed with leukemia (CLL). I have the highest respects for Dr. Conkling. He is willing to discuss any questions in detail that you ask him about your conditions and he takes the time to do it. I highly recommended him as a doctor who cares about his patients.
My wife entrusted her care to Dr. Conklin for severe anemia. Her condition warranted a bone marrow biopsy which indicated she contracted WM/LPL a rare lymphoma. Dr. Conklin claims he was never made aware of the report and inappropriately treated her for her disease for approx. 30 months and only became aware of the true nature of her disease after a biopsy of a lymph node reveled that she now had diffuse large bcell lymphoma that had transformed from the previously identified LPL lymphoma. All documented by the pathologist in his report. Needless to say, my wife died as a result despite heroic efforts by her team at Duke University Cancer Clinic
Dr. Paul Conkling has been our oncologist for now 15 years. We first met when my husband was diagnosed with Esophageal Cancer Stage III (T3N1M0). At the time we were so naïve as to what this cancer was all about, we weren�t even sure that we should consider Chemotherapy. We just wanted to rush right on over to the Operating Room and �get this thing out!� Easier said than done, we were soon to learn. After all the tests were run, and the cancer was verified, our then Surgeon Dr. Wilkes Hubbard, said that we needed to have chemo before the surgery. We reluctantly set up an appointment with Dr. Conkling. He was recommended as one of the �best!� So we went just to satisfy the the surgeon. We went in to the consultation thinking �We�ll make this one trip, but we�re not going to even consider chemo.� In other words, we knew nothing, but our minds were �already made up!� Well, we found Dr. Conkling to be very willing to answer all our questions. He was NOT pushy. He did NOT tell us what we ought to do. He gave us some statistics relative to Esophageal Cancer patients. He did tell us that statistics did show that those who had neoadjuvant chemo and radiation prior to having an Esophagectomy did fare better than those who did not, all things considered. We came home after that and were still undecided. But we decided better to be safe than sorry. And actually, we were not at all knowledgeable at the time as to how severe an Esophageal Cancer was. But we�ve since conducted prolonged research on our own from reputable sites and found that indeed trimodal approach produces the best survival results. I must add that the preop chemo/radiation totally eradicated the tumors. However, we were told that an Esophagectomy would still be conducted to be certain there was no undetected cancer left in the body. Esophageal Cancer has relatively few survivors after a 5yr. period. It is a deadly cancer. Ultimately, through research we found that Dr. James D. Luketich @ UPMC had pioneered a totally laparoscopic Esophagectomy known as the Ivor Lewis Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy. So we went there for a SECOND OPINION, and my husband was deemed a good candidate for that MIE surgery. And we thank God that my husband is now in his 14th year of survival. We credit the good results to good work by our surgeons, Dr. Conkling, our oncologist, and the Lord of course. Then in 2012, I was diagnosed with Ovarian Cancer Stage IV. I also went to the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center for a SECOND opinion. I was advised to first have chemotherapy. By now I knew better than to question the value of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We came home and I went directly to see Dr. Conkling. Since I�ve researched cancer for quite a few years now, naturally, I have lots of questions. I did read a review here that someone else had written that the �wait� time was a bit much. Shall I tell them why? Because someone like me with a terminal cancer has �his ear� and is asking lots of questions and he is giving me the answers. He draws charts and diagrams. He still monitors my husband�s recovery on a semiannual basis. He is never �out of reach�. His nurses will always consult with him if I have a question in between visits. So I for one will NEVER complain about how long I have to wait, because there is most likely another patient in the other room who needs the same amount of undivided attention that he gives to both me and my husband. Anyone considering selecting him as their oncologist, I have only one thing to say. �He is worth the WAIT!� If you had a higher rating than 5 stars, I would give him all of them. He�s a �TEN� in our book!�
DR. CONKLING HAS BEEN GREAT. HE IS SO SWEET WHEN TALKING TO MY MOTHER..HE TELLS IT LIKE IT IS EVEN IF IT IS HARD TO SWALLOW BUT HE KNOWS HOW TO DO HIS JOB.HES EXCELLENT AND IM SO GLAD HE AND CATHY (ASSISTANT) ARE ALWAYS THERE TO HELP.
Did you find this reputation scorecard helpful?
Locations
No related location
Selection Criteria
All the information you see here is based on our analysis of internet reviews across the seven major review platforms most used by consumers during their healthcare provider selection. The platforms we selected are Google, WebMD, Yelp, HealthGrades, Facebook, RateMDs, and Vitals. The analysis algorithm uses the compiled data of average score, recency of reviews, number of reviews, and the sentiment expressed in the written comments. It then assigns weight to each parameter based on the available research on how consumers use reviews in their doctor selection process. This report is designed to help identify the doctors with the best overall review score in an area and does not reflect the doctors' competence.
Disclaimer
We recognize the importance of reviews in your selection of a healthcare provider. While we strive to make the information on this report as accurate as possible, ScoreDoc makes no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of this report and is not liable for errors and omissions in the materials. ScoreDoc works with a 3rd party to collect data for generating this report. We encourage you to review the report for accuracy by visiting individual review platforms of doctors of interest based on their overall review score. We suggest you consider this report as initial input and independently verify all info before deciding on your healthcare provider.
Google
WebMD
Yelp
HealthGrades
Facebook
RateMDs
Vitals
